Open Access Week 2019: Open for Whom? Equity in Open Knowledge

It is 2019 International Open Access Week!

Open Access Week 2019

From October 21-27, 2019, the Campus Library and UW Libraries celebrate International Open Access Week! This year’s theme, “Open for Whom? Equity in Open Knowledge” is centering equity in access, in participation in knowledge creation, and in research communication.

According to the 2019 Open Access Week Advisory Committee, “As the transition to a system for sharing knowledge that is open by default accelerates, the question ‘open for whom?’ is essential—both to consider and to act upon. Whose interests are being prioritized in the actions we take and in the platforms that we support? Whose voices are excluded? Are underrepresented groups included as full partners from the beginning? Are we supporting not only open access but also equitable participation in research communication? These questions will determine the extent to which emerging open systems for research will address inequities in the current system or replicate and reinforce them.”

In recognition of Open Access Week, the Campus Library has installed a thought-provoking display on the first floor illustrating the real financial impact of research articles and books for knowledge production in a non-open access environment.

Year-round, UWB/CC librarians and library staff provide support about open access! You can learn more about the Campus Library’s commitment to open access resources and collections through the following resources:

This year, librarians and library staff at all three UW campuses have organized campus specific OA Week events such as the UWB/CC Campus Library display, a panel discussion at UW Tacoma on Open Educational Resources, and UW Seattle has workshops on creative commons and accessibility. We hope you participate and enjoy the Open Access Week events! And we look forward to hearing your ideas and thoughts here on the blog or through social media by using the official twitter hashtag #OAWeek or tagging your discussions around this year’s theme with the hashtag #OpenForWhom.

Please contact Sarah Leadley, Library Director, Denise Hattwig, Head of Digital Scholarship + Collections, or your subject librarian if you would like to talk more about open access!

Library Support for UW Faculty Open Access Policy

Hello from the Campus Library Open Access Team and welcome back! As you settle into the new quarter, we wanted to highlight how the Open Access Team and the Library can help you make your work more openly available.

In 2018, the Faculty Senate approved the UW Open Access Policy, enabling faculty to make their articles available in an open access repository. If you have questions, we can help! See below for some resources and readings:

If you are ready to deposit scholarly work into UW’s institutional repository, ResearchWorks, instructions are available on the UWB Digital Scholarship Guide.

For questions related to the UW Open Access Policy, please contact Sarah Leadley, Associate Dean and Library Director, at leadley@uw.edu, or Denise Hattwig, Head of Digital Scholarship and Collections, at dhattwig@uw.edu.

For the Public Good: Our values in a changing scholarly communication landscape

This is a collaborative post by Lizabeth (Betsy) A. Wilson, Vice Provost for Digital Initiatives and Dean of University Libraries; Denise Pan, Associate Dean for Collections & Content; Chelle Batchelor, Interim Associate Dean, Research and Learning Services; Director of Access Services; Tania P. Bardyn, Associate Dean & Director, Health Sciences Library; Corey Murata, Director, Collection Analysis & Strategy; Gordon J. Aamot, Director, Scholarly Communication & Publishing; and Elizabeth Bedford, Scholarly Publishing Outreach Librarian.

Like many of you, we have been following the negotiations between the University of California (UC) and the giant commercial scholarly publisher, Elsevier. UC’s announcement that they have broken off talks with Elsevier has sparked a wave of interest and commentary reaching beyond the walls of the academy. In a blog post by our colleagues at Duke and Iowa State University, they called this a movement, “closer to a tipping point in the ongoing struggle to correct asymmetries in the scholarly information ecosystem.”

There is a disconnect in the scholarly publishing ecosystem between the creators of scholarship and the ownership and distribution of scholarship, especially with mega-publishers like Elsevier. Researchers publish their findings without the expectation of additional compensation in the interest of advancing human knowledge and building careers. Researchers also evaluate each other’s work for free by doing peer review. But the results of this scholarly output are almost always controlled by publishers and usually hidden behind paywalls.

While the breakdown of the UC/Elsevier negotiation is big news, it is just the latest in a growing list of cancellations by our peer institutions of publisher “big deal” journal packages. In its Big Deal Cancellation Tracking list, the Scholarly Publishing and Academic Resources Coalition (SPARC) provides the names of institutions and the packages they have recently cut. These cancellations are a reflection of the widening gulf between for-profit publishers’ demands to continually increase package cost well beyond the rate of inflation, and the ongoing erosion of support for higher education. In her annual address to the University of Washington last fall, President Ana Mari Cauce highlighted the unsustainability of the funding model for higher education in our state. While UW Libraries has been fortunate to receive strong support from the faculty and University, we can see that gulf forming.

With the Libraries in the implementation phase of our recently developed 2018-2021 Strategic Plan, it is valuable to step back and reflect on our values as we think about this changing landscape of scholarly communication and our future negotiations with publishers. Among these values are a focus on sustainability, equity and user-centeredness.

  • Sustainability: While we are committed to providing collections and resources for our students, faculty and researchers, we are unwavering in the knowledge that we must be good stewards of allocated funding to support research and teaching at the University of Washington. In our negotiations with publishers, we continually balance researchers’ needs with fiscal responsibility. Working collaboratively with our campus community to build collections can accelerate scholarship and learning through responsive collections.
  • Equity: We believe the current proprietary, closed, for-profit scholarly information ecosystem is broken, exclusionary and undermines the democratic ideals of liberal education. We view access to information as a social justice issue, and for-profit publishers’ unsustainable pricing models, demand for nondisclosure agreements and insistence on paywalls hinders the pursuit of knowledge, impedes our support of an informed citizenry and restricts research for the public good
  • User-centeredness: Our commitment to users remains at the forefront of our collections strategy and decision-making. We know that scholarship is a conversation — and that research progresses only when scholars have an understanding of what has come before and are able to share new knowledge. Because our library collections form the lifeblood of this conversation, we are keenly concerned with ensuring UW scholars have access to the materials they need to progress their research.

The negotiations between UC and Elsevier are part of an accelerating, worldwide movement to transform scholarly communication, to ensure knowledge is shared broadly and without barriers, and to further enhance inquiry and discovery. We applaud UC’s attempt to explore new and different models for providing access to scholarship. And we stand in support of finding new pathways to build and negotiate transformative models that create collaborative and sustainable long-term solutions. As stated in our Strategic Plan, UW Libraries works to advance research for the public good because we believe that “UW research attains its greatest impact on our most pressing global challenges when we advocate for open, public and emerging forms of scholarship.”

Please contact us with questions or comments:
Sarah Leadley, Associate Dean of UW Libraries and UW Bothell/Cascadia Library Director, leadley@uw.edu

OA Week – Open Educational Resources!

OERschools.com logo by B. Haßler, H. Neo & J. Fraser/ Leicester City Council

It’s International Open Access Week!
Have you thought about using course materials that offer your students free or low cost access?

What are Open Educational Resources?
OERs are any type of educational materials that are in the public domain or introduced with an open license. The nature of these open materials means that anyone can legally and freely copy, use, adapt and re-share them.  -UNESCO

Why use OER?
Using OERs in your course can have a huge impact on students by reducing or eliminating textbook costs and lowering the overall cost of higher education. OERs can also enhance your pedagogy! You can use OER repositories to find new ideas, activities and resources posted by instructors from around the country. Many of these resources are peer reviewed and frequently updated.

How are UWB/CC Faculty using OER?
Faculty on both campuses are integrating OER into their courses. Are you using OER in your class? Let us know!

Want to find out more?
Check out our Open Educational Resources guide for more information about OER resources, Open Textbook repositories, and examples of OER adoption on our campus.

Ask us!

Sincerely, your UWB/CC OER Team :  Alyssa Berger, Todd Conaway, Bryce Figueroa, Nia Lam, Sarah Leadley, Suzan Parker, Anne Tuominen, and Chris Zempel

We are a cross-campus group dedicated to supporting faculty as they explore the world of OER, affordable textbook options, and expanded use of Libraries licensed materials.

It is Open Access Week!

Open Access Week 2017 logo

Image by Nick Shockey, openaccessweek.org, CC-BY-4.0

 

This week the Library is participating in international Open Access Week! Open Access Week is a celebration of shared knowledge, open scholarship, and barrier-free research and scholarly publishing. Learn more about Open Access Week on their website.

The UW Libraries has assembled an inspiring collection of voices from across the University of Washington describing faculty and staff experiences with open access and with practicing open scholarship and research. This project is called “How I Work Open.” Please stop by the Library to see posters featuring your colleagues’ stories! These stories are also posted on the UW Libraries’ new open access blog, Open @ UW . Keep an eye out for UWB IAS Senior Lecturer Julie Shayne and UWB/CC Library Digital Scholarship + Collections Curator Denise Hattwig.

And as a reminder, here are links to our UWB/CC Library open access resources:

Please contact Sarah Leadley, Library Director, or your subject librarian if you’d like to talk more about open access or how you can “work open!”

Preprints: What, Why, and Where?

The paths of Scholarly Publishing and Open Access can be difficult to follow.  What are your rights as a researcher and scholar, when and how do those rights change, what are publisher rights, who pays whom, and who has access to the published research?  When you have managed to figure out your way on that path, you may encounter various acronyms and terms that can also make the going slow, e.g. CTA, Gold OA, IR, SHERPA, & preprint. What do they mean, and do they really matter?

Let’s just start with one of these terms: the preprint.  In our previous post on Understanding Your Author Rights, we mentioned that you may be able to archive a preprint of your article in our institutional repository (IR), ResearchWorks.  So, what is a preprint and why might you want to archive it?

A preprint is generally understood to be a working paper or a pre-publication version of a paper. Publishers often define preprints more precisely, and may specify that a preprint is an author’s final version, a version prior to peer review, or any version of the paper prior to its final editing and formatting. Review your CTA (Copyright Transfer Agreement) to determine your publisher’s definition of a preprint. Searching SHERPA/RoMEO by journal or publisher can also provide you with specific preprint archiving policies.

If you determine that it is permitted and you would like to archive your preprint, your research and other scholars can enjoy the following benefits:

  • The core of your research becomes available more quickly
  • Your research will have broader exposure, reaching those both with and without access to expensive databases and journals
  • Articles can be open access
  • OA funder mandates can be met (consult your funder or Sherpa/Juliet to determine funder mandates
  • Payments to publisher for Open Access status are not required

Okay, you have made it this far down the road with us and you have determined your CTA allows you to archive your preprint.  You want to quickly provide open access to your scholarship for other researchers. Where do you go?

The University of Washington has its own institutional repository called ResearchWorks.  ResearchWorks is a permanent archiving service for UW faculty and student researchers.  More information about UWB archiving services, including a submission form, can be found on this Campus Library guide.

You may also want to consider archiving your preprints in a disciplinary repository. Amongst the many out there:

Humanities Commons for arts, literature, and digital humanities
SocArXiv  for Social Sciences
PsyArXiv for Psychological sciences
EngrXiv  for Engineering
PubMedCentral (PMC) for the biomedical and life sciences
ArXiv for Physics, Mathematics, Computer Science, Quantitative Biology, Quantitative Finance and Statistics

Check out OpenDOAR if you want to search for more repositories in your field, or search within repositories.

If you have additional questions, please contact Sarah Leadley, Campus Library Director, at leadley@uw.edu.

__________________________

References & Resources:
SHERPA on preprints: http://www.sherpa.ac.uk/romeoinfo.html#prepostprints

 

Predatory Journal Publishing

Does this sound familiar? A new message appears in your inbox: the Questionable Journal of Mysterious Origins wants to publish your research! They promise a quick turnaround time and wide readership, increasing the potential impact of your work, all for the low, low price of $300-$3000! But is this really a deal you can’t refuse?

Predatory journal publishing is an increasingly pressing issue in higher education. A study out of Finland reports a significant increase in the number of articles published in predatory journals since 2010. Stories range from the sad, as marginalized scholars succumb to the pressure of publish-or-perish, to the absurd, with Marge Simpson’s foray into computer science. Most recently, the FTC is taking action, filing a civil complaint against one particularly large and pernicious predatory publisher.

What is predatory publishing and why is it spreading? Predatory publishers take advantage of the upsurge in gold Open Access (OA), a digital, peer-reviewed journal publishing model that offers free, online, public access to research, often, though not always, by transferring publishing costs to the author (via Article Processing Charges, or APCs). Many legitimate and highly competitive peer-reviewed journals (such as PLoS Biology and IEEE Access) operate under the gold OA model and levy APCs, which are frequently covered by research funders rather than individual authors. Open access has gained so much traction that, in 2013, the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy directed federal agencies to develop public access plans, requiring recipients of federal funding to make both their articles and data publically accessible.

With any growing and potentially profitable market, however, comes the opportunity for scammers to exploit the system. Predatory publishers establish charlatan gold OA journals, charging APCs and producing online issues, without establishing or engaging in a rigorous peer review and editorial process. Essentially, they’re designed to take your money and run, copying and pasting your unedited work into poorly designed websites that, at best, may one day be crawled by Google Scholar. Yikes.

So, how does one filter out the sham journals from the legitimate publications? Jeffrey Beall of the University of Colorado Denver has long produced a directory of predatory journals known as Beall’s List. While this may be a good place to start, it must also be mentioned that Beall and his List have come under criticism of late for some arguably extreme anti-OA views. Furthermore, York University librarian John Dupuis and Barbara Fister from Inside Higher Ed point out that the obvious spam-like efforts documented by Beall and others distract us from the real problem: more underhanded and mainstream predatory practices employed by corporate publishers like Elsevier and Wiley.

Thus, as always and with any source, we recommend practicing what we preach to our students: think critically, evaluate, and verify. CUNY librarians Monica Berger and Jill Cirasella laid out the case for this more well-rounded approach, and both Grand Valley State University Library and the Directory of Open Access Journals have published comprehensive quality indicators to be used as part of a holistic review process. Authors can also enjoy all the advantages of open access while circumventing these concerns by opting for green OA, publishing their article in the journal of their choice and depositing a pre- or post-print copy in UW’s institutional repository, ResearchWorks.

Interested in publishing in a gold OA journal but hoping to avoid the pitfalls? Your subject librarians are here to help!

Open Access and Public Scholarship

Open Access and Public Scholarship

Open access and public scholarship are often complementary approaches to engaged research, teaching, and practice. Next week for Open Access Week, the UW LIbraries is hosting two events highlighting the work of UW scholars who provide open access to their research and/or work in the area of public scholarship. Both events include UW Bothell faculty, and we are pleased to be able to offer streaming access on the Bothell campus. These events are part of the Libraries’ Hacking the Academy program series, a year-long conversation about digital scholarship.

Please join us in the Campus Library, room LB2-318, for live streaming of the following events:

Monday, October 24, 2016, 4:00-5:00 Hacking the Academy: Simpson Center for the Humanities 2016 Digital Humanities Summer Fellows Showcase Learn more about the Simpson Center Digital Humanities Summer Fellowship program and hear three 2016 Summer Fellows talk about their work.

  • Darren Byler (Anthropology) – The Art of Life in Chinese Central Asia: A Repertoire of Uyghur and Han Migrant Popular Culture
  • Josephine Ensign (Psychosocial & Community Health) – Soul Stories: Health and Healing through Homelessness
  • Minda Martin (Interdisciplinary Arts & Sciences, UW Bothell)Seattle’s Freeway Revolt

Wednesday, October 26, 2016, 4:00-5:00 Hacking the Academy: Open in Action Celebrate Open Access Week by hearing how faculty on-campus are working to keep their work open. We’ll begin the program with some short talks followed by time for discussion around the theme “open in action.” Come ready to learn and share your ideas!

  • Rachel Arteaga, Assistant Program Director for Reimagining the Humanities PhD and Reaching New Publics, Simpson Center for the Humanities, speaking on public scholarship
  • Steven Roberts, Kenneth K. Chew Endowed Professor in the School of Aquatic and Fishery Sciences, speaking on open science
  • Dan Berger, Assistant Professor of Comparative Ethnic Studies at UW Bothell, speaking on public scholarship
  • Justin Marlowe, Endowed Professor of Public Finance and Civic Engagement, and Associate Dean for Executive Education Daniel J. Evans School of Public Policy and Governance, speaking on designing an open textbook

We’d also like to highlight some other UW Bothell open access and public scholarship projects, heading into Open Access Week. The Campus Library partners with UW Bothell faculty to develop a range of open access digital scholarship projects with connections to the community and engaged research. Some recent projects include the following:

Social Justice & Diversity Archive
Research and scholarship documenting the history and work of social justice organizations in the Pacific Northwest.
Faculty: Julie Shayne, Senior Lecturer, Faculty Coordinator, Gender, Women & Sexuality Studies
School of Interdisciplinary Studies, UW Bothell

Northwest Prison Archive (forthcoming) –
Interviews, documents, and new scholarship related to the carceral state in the Pacific Northwest
Faculty: Dan Berger, Assistant Professor, School of Interdisciplinary Studies, UW Bothell

Community Voices: Oral Histories at the University of Washington Bothell
Oral histories conducted by – and with – University of Washington Bothell students, staff, faculty, and community members, including histories of international students, students with disabilities, founders of UWave Radio, staff who maintain campus facilities
Faculty: Jill Freidberg, Lecturer, School of Interdisciplinary Studies, UW Bothell

Wetlands Collection
Documentation of the restoration, current use, and ongoing evolution of the UW Bothell/Cascadia College Wetlands
Faculty: Warren Gold, Associate Professor, School of Interdisciplinary Studies, UW Bothell

Please let us know if you would like more information about any of these projects, or would like to discuss your own open access/public scholarship with us.

See you next week in LB2-318!

 

 

Why Open Access?

Why Open Access?

We engage and invest in research in order to encourage innovation and creativity, enrich education, and accelerate the pace of discovery.  Communication of the results of research is an essential component of the research process, and enabling broad, unfettered access to new knowledge plays a key role in ensuring that the scholarly publishing system supports the needs of scholars and the academic enterprise as a whole.

Yet because of cost barriers or use restrictions, research results are often not available to the full community of potential users.  The Internet gives us the opportunity to bring this information to a worldwide audience at virtually no marginal cost and allows us to use it in new, innovative ways. This has resulted in a new framework: Open Access.

What is open access and why does it matter?  Materials published in an open access journal or digital repository are available online to anyone anywhere for download and use without restrictions or payment by the user.  There are many benefits to a system of open access scholarship:

  • Research is more accessible and useable.
  • Articles published open access may be cited more and be more influential than those that have not.
  • Institutions that support research – from public and private research funders to higher education institutions – are implementing policies that encourage (and in some instances require) researchers to make research generated from their funding openly accessible to and fully useable by the public.
  • Researchers have access to scholarship regardless of institutional affiliation.
  • Students have access to scholarship after they graduate.
  • Scholarly conversations are advanced through broader participation.
  • Creative work and new discoveries are encouraged as scholars can build on open research.

OA at the UW: In April 2009, the UW Faculty Senate approved a Class C Resolution on Scholarly Publishing Alternatives and Authors’ Rights,  encouraging faculty to publish in “moderately priced journals, in journals published by professional societies and associations, or in peer-reviewed ‘open access’ journals,” and to archive their work in open access repositories.  In 2015 the Senate advanced this work via another resolution, Concerning the UW Open Access Repository & Request for Advice on an Open Access Policy, which requested that a UW Open Access Policy be drafted for review by the faculty. This work is ongoing, more on this to come!

Additional Resources:

Learn about: Open Media

Open media is open access, public domain, or licensed-for-reuse video, images, sound, or multimedia. Like other open access content, open media is available for all scholars, students, and the public to incorporate into study, teaching, research, scholarship, creative work, projects, and other uses. In an environment of multimodal digital scholarship and open access values, open media is an increasingly important part of the open access landscape.

Many museums, archives, respositories, and other cultural institutions make the materials in their collections available online without restrictions on reuse. Individuals also contribute to the availability of open media by sharing their work online with a Creative Commons license or public domain designation. Consider publishing and sharing your own media productions with a CC or public domain designation so other scholars and the public know how they can use and build on your work.

Our Open Media Resources guide can help you find open media, and connect you to important open media resources such as openGLAM and the Open Culture blog. Let us know if you have questions or need more information!